- release_record
- {"population_scope":"Technology markets and relevant users; no universality unless the forecast expressly requires it.","attribution_confidence":"MEDIUM","interpretation_confidence":"MEDIUM","outcome_confidence":{"at_deadline":"MEDIUM","at_review":"MEDIUM"},"timing_confidence":"MEDIUM","date_uncertainty_affects_verdict":false,"interpretations":{"reference":{"criterion":"Longitudinal patient histories are ordinarily kept digitally; “lifetime” means accumulating records over a patient’s life, not retroactive digitization of every scrap.","at_deadline":"PARTLY_FULFILLED","at_review":"FULFILLED","rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized. By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","relaxed_or_changed_conditions":[],"kind":"REFERENCE_READING","documented_by_year":2014,"at_deadline_rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized.","at_review_rationale":"By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","evidence_source_ids":["N17"],"verdict":"LATE","same_as_reference":false,"eligible_for_deadline_metrics":true,"deadline_year":2009,"outcome_assessment_complete":true},"strict":{"criterion":"Longitudinal patient histories are ordinarily kept digitally; “lifetime” means accumulating records over a patient’s life, not retroactive digitization of every scrap.","at_deadline":"PARTLY_FULFILLED","at_review":"FULFILLED","rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized. By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","relaxed_or_changed_conditions":[],"kind":"SAME_AS_REFERENCE","documented_by_year":2014,"at_deadline_rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized.","at_review_rationale":"By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","evidence_source_ids":["N17"],"verdict":"LATE","same_as_reference":true,"eligible_for_deadline_metrics":true,"deadline_year":2009,"outcome_assessment_complete":true},"broader":{"criterion":"Longitudinal patient histories are ordinarily kept digitally; “lifetime” means accumulating records over a patient’s life, not retroactive digitization of every scrap.","at_deadline":"PARTLY_FULFILLED","at_review":"FULFILLED","rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized. By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","relaxed_or_changed_conditions":[],"kind":"REFERENCE_READING","documented_by_year":2014,"at_deadline_rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized.","at_review_rationale":"By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","evidence_source_ids":["N17"],"verdict":"LATE","same_as_reference":true,"eligible_for_deadline_metrics":true,"deadline_year":2009,"outcome_assessment_complete":true}},"non_scoring_comparators":[{"criterion":"Each person has a complete interoperable cradle-to-grave record spanning all providers.","at_deadline":"PARTLY_FULFILLED","at_review":"PARTLY_FULFILLED","verdict":"PARTIAL","rationale":"EHR adoption does not establish complete lifetime coverage or interoperability. The stronger literal completeness reading remains partial.","relaxed_or_changed_conditions":[],"kind":"ALTERNATIVE_READING","documented_by_year":null,"same_as_reference":false,"evidence_source_ids":["N17"],"eligible_for_deadline_metrics":false,"eligible_for_author_accuracy":false,"comparator_warning":"Stronger than the located wording; not an obligation of the original forecast and excluded from accuracy calculations."}],"timing":{"first_full_achievement_year":null,"documented_by_year":2014,"achievement_interval_years":null,"kind":"DOCUMENTED_BY","label":"Documented by 2014; after 2009, no later than 2014","drift_years":null,"drift_range_years":null},"deduplication":{"is_canonical":true,"is_repeated_identical_claim":false,"counting_unit":"DISTINCT_FORECAST_VERSION","note":"Different deadlines or materially different thresholds remain separate versions; identical legacy repetitions are linked, not recounted."},"revision_history":[],"is_new_in_v03":true,"counting_policy":{"unit":"distinct_forecast_version","identical_repetitions_count_once":true,"alternative_interpretations_count_once":true,"legacy_conditional_rows_count":false},"id":"K064","slug":"k064-patient-histories-become-lifelong-digital-records","title":"Patient histories become lifelong digital records","prediction_paraphrase":"Patient histories become lifelong digital records","wording_kind":"EDITORIAL_PARAPHRASE","original_quote":null,"primary_category":"Biology & medicine","tags":[],"subcategory":"","claim_type":"ADOPTION","family_id":"K064","parent_statement_id":null,"legacy_ids":[],"origin":"NEW_SOURCE_EXTRACTION","publication":{"forecast_year":1999,"year_basis":"AUTHOR_ADAPTATION_OR_RETROSPECTIVE","original_book_edition_checked":false,"forecast_year_status":"ATTRIBUTED_1999"},"target":{"text":"2009","deadline_year":2009,"precision":"YEAR","year_start":2009,"year_end":2009,"interpretation":"End of named target year."},"source_verification":{"state":"AUTHOR_ADAPTATION_CHECKED","confidence":"MEDIUM","book_text_not_independently_collated":true},"success_criteria":"Longitudinal patient histories are ordinarily kept digitally; “lifetime” means accumulating records over a patient’s life, not retroactive digitization of every scrap.","assessment":{"at_deadline_rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized.","at_review_rationale":"By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","verdict_qualifier":null,"outcome_evidence_basis":"DIRECT_AND_CONTEXTUAL_EVIDENCE_WITH_EXPLICIT_EDITORIAL_INTERPRETATION","attribution_is_separate":true,"first_event_date_required_for_verdict":false,"at_review_semantics":"FULL_REALIZATION_HAS_OCCURRED_BY_REVIEW_NOT_NECESSARILY_CURRENT_PRODUCT_SALES","review_state":"EDITORIAL_ASSESSMENT_COMPLETE","verdict":"LATE","as_of":"2026-10-15","at_deadline":"PARTLY_FULFILLED","at_review":"FULFILLED","confidence":"MEDIUM","disputed_interpretation":true,"benchmark_ready":true,"rationale":"EHR adoption was still low in the 2008–2009 US baseline, so ordinary digital longitudinal records were only partly realized. By 2014 most US hospitals and more than half of physicians had adopted EHRs; subsequent adoption increased. This supports late longitudinal-database fulfillment.","first_full_achievement_year":null,"full_achievement_documented_by_year":2014,"drift_years":null,"drift_range_years":null,"still_unfulfilled_as_of_review":false,"eligible_for_deadline_metrics":true,"withheld_reason":null},"prediction_sources":[{"source_id":"P02","locator":"P02 Health care in 2009, lifetime-records bullet","role":"FORECAST_ATTRIBUTION"}],"evidence":[{"source_id":"N17","locator":"US series: 2008 hospitals 9%, physicians 17%; 2014 76% and 51%; 2022 99% and 84%. Definitions evolve; adoption does not prove complete interoperable lifetime records.","role":"OUTCOME_EVIDENCE"}],"limitations":"US adoption is the explicit evaluation population. Reference does not demand universality, but it also does not claim all historic records are complete or interoperable.","open_questions":["Original-edition collation remains an attribution task; it does not erase the stated outcome assessment.","An earlier documented instance could refine timing; the documented-by date is not claimed to be the invention year."],"legacy_relations":[]}